ORMAN OKULLARININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR EĞİTİM VE EKOLOJİK OKURYAZARLIK ÜZERİNDEKİ ROLÜ
THE ROLE OF FOREST SCHOOLS ON SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION AND ECOLOGICAL LITERACY
Abstract views: 41
/ 
PDF downloads: 8
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11617277Keywords:
Forest school, sustainable education, ecological literacy, nature-based education, environmental awareness, sustainable living, ecosystems, forest school practices in Turkey.Abstract
Forest schools have an important role in sustainable education and ecological literacy. This education model aims to increase students’ environmental awareness and develop their sustainable living skills by providing a learning environment intertwined with nature. Forest school practices in Turkey have been implemented in line with these objectives and have made significant contributions to increasing students’ ecological literacy by providing nature-based education.
Sustainable education aims to raise individuals’ awareness on sustainability issues with their environmental, economic and social dimensions and to shape their lifestyles in line with this awareness. Forest schools put sustainable education into practice, providing students with opportunities to directly experience and apply it. In this context, forest school practices in Turkey enable students to become aware of sustainability and act with this awareness.
Ecological literacy refers to individuals’ knowledge about ecosystems and the impacts of human activities on them, and the ability to apply this knowledge in their lives. Forest schools are an effective educational model for developing ecological literacy. Forest school practices in Turkey offer students the opportunity to get to know ecosystems closely and learn to live in harmony with nature. In this way, students can better understand the cycles of nature and the impacts of human activities on these cycles. Forest schools also help students develop sustainable living skills. Nature-based education strengthens students’ connection with nature and instills in them an awareness of environmental protection. By providing students with these skills, forest school practices in Turkey contribute to raising conscious individuals for a sustainable future.
In conclusion, forest schools have an important role in sustainable education and ecological literacy. Forest school practices in Turkey have a great potential for the dissemination and integration of this education model into the education system. Forest schools increase students’ environmental awareness, enabling them to develop sustainable living skills and increase their ecological literacy. In this context, it should be emphasized that forest schools should be further supported and disseminated.
References
Ahi, B. (2015). Okul öncesi eğitim programına kaynaştırılan çevre eğitimi programının çocukların çevre kavramı hakkındaki zihinsel model gelişimine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Ankara.
Akçay, İ. (2006). Farklı ülkelerde okul öncesi öğrencilerine yönelik çevre eğitimi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.
Atasoy, E. (2006). Çevre için eğitim ve çocuk-doğa etkileşimi. Bursa: Ezgi
Başbay, M., ve Atmaca, E. (2022). Investigating forest school implementations with the views of stakeholders. Current Research in Education, 5(1),72-100.
Bayraktar, H., ve Fırat, T. (2020). İlkokul öğrencilerinin çevre farkındalıkları. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, 3(1), 52-71.
Berberoğlu, H., ve Uygun, S. (2013). Sınıf dışı eğitimin dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki gelişiminin incelenmesi. Mersin Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 33-42.
Blackwell, S. (2015), The archimedes forest schools model. Archimedes Earth Press.
Borradaile, L. (2006). Report to forestry commission Scotland and forest education initiative Scotland. Forestry Commission Scotland.
Çavuş, Ş. (2004). Problem çözme becerisinin temel felsefesi. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,10, 160-171.
Collado, S., Staats, H., and Corraliza, J. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children’s summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 37–44.
Durkan, N., Güngör, H., Fetihi, L., Erol, A., ve Gülay-Ogelman, H. (2015). Comparison of environmental attitudes and experiences of five-year-old children receiving preschool education in the village and city centre. Early Child Development and Care, 186(8), 1327- 1341.
Eroğlu, S. B. (2018), İstanbul’da bir devlet anaokulu’ndaki orman okulu programının incelenmesi . Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Buldur 305
Genç, H. (2015). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarının çoklu zekâ alanları ile çevreye karşı tutumlarının incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Konya.
Gerrish, M. K. (2014). An examination of teachers’ lived experiences while working at naturebased preschool programs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University, USA.
Gülay, H. (2011). Reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of the Children’s Attitudes toward the Environment Scale-Preschool Version (CATESPV) and the analysis of children’s pro environmental behaviors according to different variables. Asian Social Science, 7(10), 229-240.
Harris, F. (2017). The nature of learning at forest school: practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 45(2), 272- 291.
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Kesicioğlu, S., ve Alisinanoğlu, F. (2009). 60-72 aylık çocukların çevreye karşı tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 37-48.
Kiewra, C., and Veselack, E. (2016). Playing with Nature: Supporting Preschoolers’ Creativity in Natural Outdoor Classrooms. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 4(1), 70-95.
Mackinder, M. (2017). Footprints in the woods: Tracking’a nursery child through a Forest School. Session. Education 3-13 International Journal of Primary Elemantary and Early Years Education 45(2), 176-190.
Morrison, G., S. (2003). Fundamentals of early childhood education (3rd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Nawaz, H., ve Blackwell, S. (2014). Perceptions about forest schools: Encouraging and promoting Archimedes Forest Schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(15), 498- 503.
O’Brien, L., ve Murray, R. (2007). Forest School and its impacts on young children: Case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6(4), 249-265.
O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education , 37(1), 45-60.
Okur-Berberoğlu, E. O. B., ve Uygun, S. (2013). Sınıf dışı eğitimin dünyadaki ve Türkiye’deki gelişim durumunun örgün ve yaygın eğitim kapsamında incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 32-42.
Pramling- Samuelsson, I., (2011). Why we should begin early with ESD: The role of Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(2),103-118.
Ridgers, N. D., Knowles, Z. R., ve Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A childfocused case study of Forest School. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 49-65.
Rivkin, M. S. (1995). The great outdoors: Restoring children’s right to play outside. National Association for the Education of Young Children, 2(1), 1509.
Roe, J. ve Aspinall, P. (2011). The restorative outcames of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(3), 205-212.
Slade, M., Lowery, C., ve Bland, K. (2013). Evaluating the impact of forest schools: A collaboration between a university and a primary school. Support for Learning, 28(2).
Soydan, S., ve Samur, A. O. (2014). A comparative study on the environmental attitudes of60 66- month-old children and their mothers. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 4(2). 27-36.
Taşdemir, Z.(2021). Ekoloji-Ekonomi Etkisi: Neoklasik Çevre İktisadi ile Ekonomik İktisadi Düşünce Birbirini Tamamlıyor mu? Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2021, 6(2): 356-370
Thomas, I.(2009).Critical Thinking, Transformative Learning, Sustainable Education, And Problem-Based Learning İn Universities. Journal of Transformative Education, 7(3), 245- 264.
Tuncer, G. Ertepinar H., Tekkaya C., ve Sungur, S. (2005). Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: Effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research, 11, 215–233.
Waite, S., Davis, B. ve Brown, K. (2006). Forest school principles: ‘Why we dowhat we do’. Report University of Plymouth, Plymouth.
Warden, C. (2012). Nature kindergartens and forest schools. Perthshire, Scotland: Mindstretchers.
Wilson, R. (1996). The development of the ecological self. Early Childhood Education Journal, 24(2) 121-123.
Yılmaz, O., Boone, W. J. and Anderson, H. O. (2004). Views of elementary and middle school Turkish students toward environmental issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1527-1546.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
