INVESTIGATION OF THE OPINIONS OF WORKSHOP AND LABORATORY TEACHERS WORKING IN VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL ANATOLIAN HIGH SCHOOLS ON THE DISTANCE EDUCATION PROCESS


Abstract views: 104 / PDF downloads: 32

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476211

Keywords:

Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Liseleri, Öğretmen Uzaktan Eğitim

Abstract

The Covid-19 epidemic, which has a very strong impact in the world and in our country, has accelerated the implementation of a number of practices. In March 2020, schools in our country were closed due to the epidemic and education was suspended for a long time. This has brought distance education to the agenda and investments have been made in this regard. As of September 2020, distance education practices have started to be implemented at all education levels and have brought about discussions on this issue. In this study, it is aimed to examine how distance education, which has increased in importance after the recent epidemic, is implemented in Vocational and Technical Anatolian High Schools, according to teachers' opinions. This study was prepared considering that Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School students differ from the students studying in primary schools, secondary schools and academic high schools. The positive or negative effects of the fact that most of the curriculum in these schools is based on practice have been investigated. During the research process, the phenomenological pattern was preferred as a model in qualitative research designs. The study group of the research consists of 14 volunteer workshop and laboratory teachers from different branches, determined by easily accessible sampling method, one of the purposeful sampling methods. In the research, a semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers after expert opinion and pilot application was used as a data collection tool. The interview data collected through this form was analyzed through content analysis. In the research, it was determined that teachers working in vocational and technical anatolian high schools had negative perspectives on distance education. The biggest reason for this is that the majority of the lessons required practice. In addition, it was determined during the research process that the socio-economic status of the students studying in these schools negatively affects participation in distance education and eliminates equality of opportunity, and this situation is the biggest obstacle to the efficiency of distance education.

References

Ağır, F., Gür, H. ve Okçu, A. (2008). Uzaktan eğitime karşı tutum ölçeği geliştirmeye yönelik geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Education Sciences, 3(2), 128-139.

Akgül, G. (2021). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin, ortaokul öğrencilerinin ve öğrenci velilerinin pandemi sürecindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri. Yüksek lisans tezi, Uşak Üniversitesi, Uşak.

Bozkurt, A. (2016). Bağlantıcı kitlesel açık çevrimiçi derslerde etkileşim örüntüleri ve öğreten-öğrenen rollerinin belirlenmesi. Doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.

Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Demir, F. ve Özdaş, F. (2020). Covıd-19 sürecindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi (Araştırma Makalesi). Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 49(Özel Sayı 1), 273-292.

Fırat, M. (2017). Understanding Turkish students’ preferences for distance education depending on financial circumstances: A large-scale CHAID analysis. International Review of Education, 63(2), 197-212.

Göktaş, Y., Gedik, N., Karoğlu, A. ve Çağıltay, K. (2009). Öğretim teknolojilerinin Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Dönemi’ndeki tarihsel gelişimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 81-92.

İşman, A. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim (3. bs.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Jones, N. B., & Laffey, J. (2002). How to Facilitate E-Collaboration and E- Learning in Organization “,The ASTD E -Learning Handbook: Best Practices, Strategies and Case Studies for an emerging field, Mc Graw Hill Companies, 25.

Karacaoğlu, M., Karakuş, N., Esendemir, N. ve Ucuzsatar, N. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim üzerine bir araştırma: Türkçe Öğretmenleriyle Mülakatlar. International Journal of Language Academy, 9(1), 124-144.

Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan eğitim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Özdemir Baki, G. ve Çelik, E. (2021). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitimde matematik öğretim deneyimleri. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 293-320.

Özdoğan, A. Ç. ve Berkant, H. G. (2020). COVID-19 pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 13-43.

Pınar, M.A. ve Akgül, G.D. (2020). Covid-19 salgını sürecinde fen bilimleri dersinin uzaktan eğitim ile verilmesine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(2), 461-486.

Sarı, T. ve Nayır, F. (2020). Challenges in distance education during the (Covid-19) pandemic period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328-360.

Taşkın, G. ve Aksoy G. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 52, 622-647.

Türk Dil Kurumu. (2022). 27 Şubat 2022 tarihinde https://sozluk.gov.tr/ adresinden erişildi.

Ural, M. N. (2015). Antik Yunan’da “teknik”: Teknoloji felsefesi tarihine genel bir bakış. Mavi Atlas, 4, 136-144.

Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınıcılık.

Published

2024-01-10 — Updated on 2024-01-10

How to Cite

İLHAN, U., ÖGE, A., ÖGE, Y., ORUÇ, T., GÜNGÖR, H. B., & ELÇİ, R. (2024). INVESTIGATION OF THE OPINIONS OF WORKSHOP AND LABORATORY TEACHERS WORKING IN VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL ANATOLIAN HIGH SCHOOLS ON THE DISTANCE EDUCATION PROCESS. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 9(36), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10476211

Most read articles by the same author(s)