THEORETICAL BASIS FOR EXAMINING EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP IN PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

ÖZEL ÖĞRETİM KURUMLARINDA GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN KURAMSAL TEMELDE İNCELENMESİ


Abstract views: 38 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15065656

Keywords:

Private Education Institutions, Empowering Leadership, Theoretical

Abstract

This study examines the theoretical foundations of empowering leadership in private educational institutions and discusses the impact of this leadership style on the success of these institutions. Empowering leadership is based on empowering employees, increasing their motivation, and strengthening their organizational commitment. This leadership style particularly helps teachers and other staff in educational institutions to unlock their potential and contribute to achieving the institution's goals. Empowering leadership can be defined as granting employees more authority and responsibility in their tasks, ensuring their active participation in decision-making processes, and providing autonomy in work processes. This approach enhances employees' commitment to the organization while also supporting their individual development. Private educational institutions operate in a more competitive environment compared to public educational institutions. These institutions must provide higher-quality education to their students and meet the expectations of parents. Therefore, leadership plays a critical role in the success of private educational institutions. In this context, empowering leadership emerges as an effective management model that enables private educational institutions to achieve their goals. The importance of empowering leadership in private educational institutions is particularly evident in terms of teacher motivation and professional development. Teachers are the most important actors in the educational process, and student success largely depends on their performance. Empowering leadership trusts teachers' abilities, empowers them, and involves them in decision-making processes. This makes teachers feel valued and increases their professional commitment. Additionally, empowering leadership encourages the implementation of innovative educational models in private educational institutions. When teachers are empowered, they feel freer to develop and apply their own methods. This creates an educational environment that better responds to the individual needs of students. For example, teachers can develop methods tailored to students' learning styles and deliver their lessons more effectively. Empowering leadership also promotes teamwork in private educational institutions. The leader enhances collaboration and solidarity among employees, facilitating the achievement of the institution's goals. Teachers can create a more effective educational process by benefiting from each other's experiences and knowledge. This situation increases harmony and cooperation among employees, especially in the competitive environment often found in private educational institutions. The effects of empowering leadership on private educational institutions can be examined in terms of teacher performance, student success, and organizational commitment. This leadership style boosts teachers' motivation, enabling them to perform at a higher level. When teachers are empowered, they can manage their tasks better and guide students more effectively. This positively impacts students' academic success. Furthermore, empowering leadership supports the professional development of teachers in private educational institutions. The leader provides continuous training and development opportunities, helping teachers enhance their professional knowledge and skills. This enables teachers to feel more competent and offer higher-quality education to students. Empowering leadership also increases organizational commitment in private educational institutions. When employees feel valued and actively strive to achieve organizational goals, their commitment to the institution grows. This is particularly important in private educational institutions, where staff turnover is frequent, as it ensures institutional continuity.

References

Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945-955.

Akçakaya, M. (2010). 21.Yüzyılda yeni liderlik anlayışı. Adalet.

Akın, M. (2010). Personeli güçlendirme algılaması, örgüt iklimi algılaması ve yaratıcı kişi özelliklerinin örgüt düzeyinde yaratıcı çıktılar üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29, 211-238.

Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadership Quarterly, 25, 487-511.

Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Springer.

Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249- 269.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.

Başaran, İ. E. (2008). Örgütsel davranış: İnsanın üretim gücü. Ekinoks.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher's perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1(2), 117-145.

Bolat, T. (2003). Personeli güçlendirme: davranışsal ve bilişsel boyutta incelenmesi ve benzer yönetim kavramlarıyla karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(3-4), 199-219.

Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983

Doğan, S. (2003). Rekabette başarının anahtarı: Personel güçlendirme: Empowerment. (1.Baskı). Sistem Yayıncılık.

Doğan, S. ve Kılıç, S. (2007). Örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasında personel güçlendirmenin yeri ve önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 37-61.

Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2015). Empowering leadership and organizational job embeddednes: the moderating roles of task ınterdependence and organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 3-10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.321

Genç, Z. (2017). Otel işletmeleri çalışanlarının psikolojik güçlendirme ve mentorluk ihtiyaçları. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 7(1), 91-97.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

Günbayı, İ., Dağlı, E. ve Kalkan, F. (2013). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin destekleyici davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 19(4), 575-602.

Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). Jossey-Bass.

Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Making the case for procedural justice: Employees thrive and work hard. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35, 100-114.

Koçel, T. (2015). İşletme yöneticiliği (16. baskı). Beta Yayınları.

Konan, N. ve Çelik, O. T. (2017). Okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen algısı. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 322-335.

Konan, N. ve Çelik, O. T. (2018). Güçlendirici Liderlik ölçeğinin eğitim örgütleri için Türkçe ’ye uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1043-1054.

Konczak, L.J., Stelly, D.J., & Trusty, M.L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedback instrument. Educational and Psychological measurement, 60(2), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420

Lee, A., & Nie, Y. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 260-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215578448

Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 306-325.

Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573-596.

Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2001). New superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. Berrett-Koehler.

Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372-1395.

Özmutaf, M. N. (2007). Liderliğin örgüt kültürü içinde değişimsel boyutta değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 83-98

Öztürk, A. ve Özdemir, F. (2003). İşletmelerde personel güçlendirmeye dayalı iş doyumunun artırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1-2), 189-202.

Pearce, C., & Sims, H. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of adverse, directive, transactional transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172-197.

Pelenk, S. E. (2020). Güçlendirici liderlik davranışlarının bireysel performansa etkisi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 308- 330. https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.675625

Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in- role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63, 1743-1770.

Siyal, S. (2023). Leadership and management in organizations: Perspectives from SMEs and MNCs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1156727.

Soylu, S. ve Okçu, V. (2022). Okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderlik davranışları i̇le öğretmenlerin psikolojik dayanıklılık düzeyleri arasındaki i̇lişki. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 752-767. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.1103044

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865

Şama, E. ve Kolamaz, C. (2011). Destekleyici ve geliştirici liderlik özellikleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 313-342

Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.

Thompson, N. (2016). Güç ve güçlendirme. Nika

Uğurluoğlu, Ö. ve Çelik, Y. (2009). Örgütlerde stratejik liderlik ve özellikleri. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 12(2), 121-156.

Yılmaz, H. (2011). Güçlendirici liderlik. (1. Baskı). Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.

Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Pearson-Prentice Hall.

Yukl, G. (2018). Örgütlerde liderlik. (Ş. Çetin, R. Baltacı, Çev.). Nobel Yayıncılık.

Yun, S., Cox, J., & Sims, H. (2006). The forgotten follower: A contingency model of leadership and follower self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 374-388.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118

Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-Efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (202-231). Cambridge University.

Published

2025-03-16

How to Cite

GEZER, D. Y. (2025). THEORETICAL BASIS FOR EXAMINING EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP IN PRIVATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: ÖZEL ÖĞRETİM KURUMLARINDA GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN KURAMSAL TEMELDE İNCELENMESİ. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 11(51), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15065656