EXAMINING CULTURAL CAPITAL IN A THEORETICAL CONTEXT
EXAMINING CULTURAL CAPITAL IN A THEORETICAL CONTEXT
Abstract views: 39 / PDF downloads: 14
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12698140Keywords:
Kültür, Sermaye, Kültürel SermayeAbstract
The most important actions and skills that regulate a person's life, starting from daily life skills in his immediate and distant environment, and determine the path he will follow, consist of cultural and social principles. These principles both answer people's existential questions and ensure social order. Cultural formation controlled by the moral rules and legal rules of societies; It contains qualities that reflect the unique characteristics of nations and distinguish societies from each other. Schools are institutions where cultural knowledge is transferred in the process of social adaptation, social skills and the necessary knowledge and skills for gaining a profession are taught, and education is carried out in certain places in a planned manner. Cultural capital that affects the success achieved in the education process; It is also affected by developments in the education process.
Cultural capital is expressed as the result of cultural accumulation and experiences gained through a good education. Cultural capital, in its shortest form, emerges as a result of education. Schools form the basis of cultural capital. Although the importance of schools is emphasized in the emergence of cultural capital, the most accurate expression would be to describe another important actor as the accumulations that families leave to their generations and the development of these through education from schools. Of course, the social structure of individuals and the accumulations that come with it also constitute an important point.
The cultural capital-oriented aim of education is to transmit the culture and behavioral patterns of upper-class families to the next generation. According to this perspective, education for everyone is not sufficient to ensure equality in society. The fact that schools are at different levels and that individuals have different class and family structures prevents education from providing equality. It is also seen that the cultural achievements of children studying in the same school are different. The most important step that school administrators and teachers should make in this regard is to aim to minimize inequality. Another important step is for teachers to determine the potential of their students and determine an educational approach appropriate to this potential. In order for these steps to be realized, school administrators and teachers must have reached a certain level of cultural capital. It is not possible for teachers and administrators who do not improve themselves, do not read books, do not do sports or are not interested in any branch of art to be effective transmitters. In particular, school administrators need to lead not only academic studies but also social and cultural activities.
References
Andersen, I. G., & Jaeger, M. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177-188.
Andersen, İ.G., & Jaeger, M. M. (2013). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. SFI-The Danish National Centre For Social Research. Department Of Sociology, University of Copenhagen. Working Paper.
Arun, Ö. (2009). Yaşlı bireyin Türkiye serüveni: Türkiye’de Yaşlı bireyler arasında kültürel sermaye daǧılımı. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 77-100.
Avcı, Y.E. (2015). Öğretmenlerin kültürel sermaye yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi, Gaziantep
Blessi, G. T., Tremblay, D. G., Sandri, M., & Pilati, T. (2012). New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation-evidence from the case of tohu in montreal. Elsevier Cities, 29, 397-407.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology education (Ed: John G. Richardson). New York: Greenwood Press.
Cevizci, A. (2012). Felsefe sözlüǧü. Ankara: Say Yayınları.
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 262-288.
Çankaya, İ.H. ve Tan, Ç. (2019). Okul yöneticilerinin algılarına göre kültürel sermaye hoşgörü ve tolerans arasındaki ilişki. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 23(80), 113-121.
Drummey, K. M. (2008). The role of cultural and economic capital in education. Doktora tezi, Boston University Boston College.
Eǧinli, A. T. (2011). Kültürlerarası yeterliliǧin kazanılmasında kültürel farklılık eǧitimlerinin önemi. Öneri Dergisi, 35, 215-227.
Erdoǧan, M. (2019). Bireylerin kişilik özellikleri, temel deǧerleri, iletişim becerileri ile öznel iyi oluş hali düzeyleri arasında nedenselliǧin incelenmesi: Üniversite düzeyinde turizm eǧitimi alan öǧrenciler üzerine bir araştırma. Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Ersoy, Y. (2008). İlköğretim okullarında matematik ve fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin yeterlikleri ve yetkinlik inançları. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 28-41.
Güvenç, B. (1970). İnsan ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Jaeger, M. M. (2011). Does cultural capital really affect academic achievement? New evidence from combined sibling and panel data. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 281-298.
Kaplan, M. (2000). Kültür ve dil. Istanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
Kip, S. M. (2010). Kültürel sermaye ve televizyon izleme alışkanlıkları. Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
Morgan, D. (1998). “Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research”. Qualitative Health Research, (8), 362-376.
Özcan, A. Y. ve Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Attainment of cultural capital in higher education the case of Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 6, 73-89.
Özdemir, A. A. (2007). Sosyal aǧ özellikleri bakış açısıyla sosyal sermaye ve bilgi yaratma ılişkisi: akademisyenler üzerinde yapılan bir alan araştırması. Doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
Özsoy, C. (2009). Pierre Bourdieu sosyolojisi ve simgesel şiddet. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Palabıyık, A. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu sosyolojisinde “Habitus”. Liberal Düşünce, 121 -141.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leaderhsip. (4th edition). Jossey Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35(4), 893-912.
Şişman, M. (1994). Örgüt Kültürü. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları: Eskişehir.
Throsby, D. (2005). On the sustainability of cultural capital. Sydney: Macquarie University, Department of Economics.
Turner, H. J. (2003). Human institutions: A theory of societal evolution. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. INC.
Ünal, A.Z. (2004). Sosyal tabakalaşma baǧlamında Pierre Bourdieu’nün kültürel sermaye kavramı. Doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.