POWER SOURCES USED BY SCHOOL MANAGERS ACCORDING TO TEACHERS' OPINIONS


Abstract views: 5675 / PDF downloads: 1279

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10509707

Keywords:

Nitel, nitel araştırmalar, analiz, tematik analiz

Abstract

School administrators are responsible for the fulfillment, development and continuity of educational management processes in schools. The practices and regulations put forward by the administrators in the management process of a school affect the teachers' perception of organizational creativity and the level of organizational cynicism. In order to achieve the goals of educational organizations and to achieve success, administrators benefit from the power resources they have in order to exhibit the attitudes and behaviors desired from the teachers. When the studies in the literature are examined in detail, it can be seen that the power sources used by school administrators play an important role on organizational culture, organizational climate and organizational success, the type of power or style is important for educational organizations, according to teacher perceptions, rewarding by school principals, positive personality and expertise power. It has been concluded that coercive power has a negative effect. In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the power sources used by school principals and demographic variables of teachers according to teachers' perceptions. In this study, the survey model, one of the research models, was used and applied to 309 teachers. The "multi-stage sampling" method was used while creating the sample. In this context, the following conclusions have been reached. Looking at the results of the research; It is seen that teachers' views on the charismatic power dimension, which is one of the power sources used by school principals, do not show a significant difference according to gender, education level, branch and seniority variables. It was concluded that there is a significant relationship between the branch and education status variable and coercive power.

References

Alholjailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic Analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-47.

Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1-3.

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand OAKS, CA: Sage.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013) Teaching thematic analysis: Over-coming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2),120-123.

Cote, L., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher, 27, 71-75

Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cutcliffe, J. R., & McKenna, H. P. (1999). Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: The plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 374-380.

DeSantis, L., & Ugarriza, D. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22, 351-372.

Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. London, England: Routledge.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 5, 80-92.

Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40-48.

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357.

Joffe, H. (2011) Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds), Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209-224).

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257–270). UK: Sage.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. 2008. Data Reduction Techniques for Large Qualitative Data Sets. In: Handbook for team-based qualitative research. Rowman Altamira.

Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott William and Wilkins

Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: Qualitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16, 738–744. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.12.23726.

Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 371-375.

Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1366–1386.

Savage, J. (2000). One voice, different tunes: Issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1493-1500.

Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1372–1380.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3, 68–70.

Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388–396.

Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher's experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1-2), 75-87.

Published

2024-01-22

How to Cite

ÇARIKCI, K., MERAL , H., BERKİL, S., ÇALIŞIR, A., ÖNALA, L., & ARSLAN , Özgür. (2024). POWER SOURCES USED BY SCHOOL MANAGERS ACCORDING TO TEACHERS’ OPINIONS. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 10(37), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10509707