SUBJECTIVITY, INTERSUBJECTIVITY, AND SOLIPSISM PROBLEM IN THE PHENOMENOLOGIES OF HUSSERL AND MERLEAU-PONTY
Abstract views: 249 / PDF downloads: 250
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8024597Keywords:
Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, Solipsism, Empathy, IntercorporeityAbstract
Human-beings are both unique and historical, social, cultural beings in the world. They can only exist by establishing meaningful relationships with others in a common socio-cultural life-world where they come together with the existence of others.
The encounter between self and others requires both the establishment of a socio-cultural world or the world as its already given to human existence, and the interrelations of I and other-I within this established life-world. The question of how to establish the socio-cultural world brings with itself the problem of intersubjectivity, which centers on how to establish the relationship between the self and the other.
For Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) and Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961), two important representatives of the phenomenological movement, the concept of subjectivity lies at the hearth of the problem of intersubjectivity. In establishing intersubjectivity, subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the world are concepts that are intertwined and cannot be considered independently of each other.
The aim of this study is to discuss the problem of solipsism, which centers on the question whether I am alone in this world or are there subjects other than me and the problem of intersubjectivity, which centers around the questions of how can I reveal the meanings of existence of others, how can I experience other subjects, on the basis of the concept of subjectivity, within the framework of Edmund Husserl’s and Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, to set forth the relationship between me, the other, and the cultural and social world.
References
Carman, T. (1999). The Body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophical Topics. Fall, Vol. 27, No. 2. ss. 205-226.
Carman, T. (2008). Merleau-Ponty. Routledge. USA, Canada.
De Preester, H. (2008). From Ego to Alter Ego: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty and a Layered Approach to Intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences,Vol.7:133. ss. 133-142.
De Sousa, L. A. (2018) Intersubjectivity and Freedom in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, unpublished.
De Sousa, L.A. (2019). The “Inner Weakness”- Merleau-Ponty on Intersubjectivity, Subjecticity and Husserlian Phenomenology, Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity and Values. ed. L.A. De Sousa, A. Falcato. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, UK. ss. 49-82.
Dillon, M.C. (1988). Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. Indiana University Press. USA.
Esenyel, Z.Z. (2017). Merleau-Ponty Vücudun Fenomenolojisiyle Zihin-Beden Düalizmini Aşabilir mi?. Cogito, Sonbahar, 88. ss. 106-136.
Esenyel, Z.Z. (2020). Vücudun Fenomenolojisi: Husserl, Sartre ve Merleau-Ponty. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Ankara.
Gülenç, K. (2014). Edmund Husserl’de ‘Başkasının Beni’ Sorunu ve Intersubjectivite Kavramı. Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi. 2014/1. ss. 19-39.
Husserl, E. (1929). Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der Logischen Vernunft. Halle a.d.S. XI-298 S.
Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen zu einer reinen Phiinomenologie und phiinomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch: Phiinomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Husserliana IV, The Hague: Martinus. Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations. Trans. Dorion Cairns. The Hauge: Matrinus. Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book, General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Trans. F. Kersten. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. The Hauge. London.
Husserl,E. (1950). Cartesianishe Meditationen und Pariser Vortrage. Herausgegeben und eingeleitet von Prof.Dr. S. Strasser. Haag, XXXI-224 S.
Lau. K.Y. (2004). Intersubjectivity and Phenomenology of the Other: Merleau-Ponty’s Contribution, --Space, Time and Culture. ed. D. Carr, C.Chan-Fai. Kluwer Academic Publishers.Vol.51. ss. 135-158.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2016). Algının Fenomenolojisi. İthaki. İstanbul.
Moran, D. (2017). Intercorporeality and Intersubjectivity: A phenomenological Exploration of Embodiment. Embodiment, Enaction and Culture. ed. C. Durt, T. Fuchs, and C. Tewes. The MIT Press. USA. ss.46.
Uygur, N. (2021). Edmund Husserl’de Başkasının Beni Sorunu. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. İstanbul.
Zahavi, D. (2018). Husserl’in Fenomenolojisi. Say Yayınları. İstanbul.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.