UNDERSTANDING FASHION DESIGN: “CHANGING PARADIGMS AND REPRESENTATIONAL FORMS FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE IN THE 21ST CENTURY”
MODA TASARIMINI ANLAMAK: “21. YÜZYILDA TEORİDEN PRATİĞE DEĞİŞEN PARADİGMALAR VE TEMSİL BİÇİMLERİ”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17185924Keywords:
Fashion Design, Sustainability, Dijital Fashion, Cultural SustainabilityAbstract
Fashion, as a social phenomenon, has been a concept that has been continuously studied and defined since the day it became visible, representing change through constant renewal and diversifying in scope and representation between theory and practice throughout history. While theoretical studies explore the concept through its relationship with the knowledge clusters of the social sciences, design practice tends to situate it within a framework that includes creativity components, design process principles, methodology, and objects. Associated with contemporaneity, the concept has transformed into a multilayered structure within a comprehensive cycle that sometimes draws upon the discourses of art and, especially in the last century, develops a new terminology by adopting the language and terms of technology, thereby encompassing the industry as well. Efforts to define fashion, when grounded in the subjects of social sciences and explained as the visible showcase of art-design-technology, have struggled to establish a distinctive philosophical framework. This study, under the title “Understanding Fashion Design: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Representation from Theory to Practice in the 21st Century”, aims to address the current transformation of the fashion industry within the triangle of theory-practice-representation. The results reveal that the most prominent issue in today’s fashion industry is that the dominant fast fashion system (speed, scale, access) increases environmental and social costs; by contrast, slow fashion and circular economy approaches provide strong solutions in extending product lifespan, reducing waste, and preserving cultural values through early-stage design decisions. Innovations in the field of materials-such as green chemistry, hemp fiber, and cellulosic fiber regeneration-together with zero-waste pattern strategies and modular design models demonstrate that aesthetics and environmental benefits can coexist. Technological transformation, particularly in industrial processes, is redefining fashion production and representation through RFID and traceability systems, 3D digital design, virtual prototyping, and blockchain applications. New trends in education are being reinforced through sustainable design pedagogy, problem/workshop-based learning, and interdisciplinary modules, aiming to enhance students’ competencies in life cycle–oriented thinking and decision-making. The study also emphasizes that cultural sustainability and local craftsmanship reinforce the narrative of ethical luxury and origin stories; while fashion shows and spatial representation/narrative constructs have become important tools for increasing the cultural legitimacy of brands. However, in the dimension of consumer behavior, the gap between discourse and action is striking: despite the growing awareness of sustainability, fast fashion still dominates purchasing practices. In conclusion, understanding fashion design in the 21st century requires an approach inclined toward mapping multidimensional relationships that necessitate aesthetic, functional, ethical, cultural, and global analyses. Fashion should be understood through a holistic design governance approach that considers materials, processes, representation, and communication chains together, with the designer positioned at the center. Beyond drawing a clear framework for fashion design, this study aims to provide up-to-date data for designers, fashion researchers, and educators with an approach capable of analyzing change, highlighting shifting roles, and interpreting the scope of the evolving cycle from theory to practice.
References
A. Patrica Haensley and Cecil R. Reynolds, Creativity and Intelligence, Handbook of Creativity, New York and Londan, Plenum Press, 1989, s. 111-145.
Abbott, A., & Ellison, M. (2008). Biologically inspired textiles. Elsevier.
Aponte, N. O., Gómez, J. H., Argüelles, V. T., & Smith, E. D. (2024). Fast fashion consumption and its environmental impact: A literature review. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20, 2381871.
Bhardwaj, V., & Fairhurst, A. (2010). Fast fashion: Response to changes in the fashion industry. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 20, 165–173.
Black, S., & DeLong, M. (2018). Perspectives on 10 years of Fashion Practice. Fashion Practice, 10, 262–275.
Borstrock, S. (2021). Disrupting the chain: The luxury of craftsmanship. In Environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes (pp. 21–40). Springer.
Bottani, E., Ferretti, G., Montanari, R., & Rizzi, A. (2009). The impact of RFID technology on logistics processes of the fashion industry supply chain. International Journal of RF Technologies: Research and Applications, 1, 225–252.
Brooks, A. (2019). Clothing poverty: The hidden world of fast fashion and second-hand clothes. Bloomsbury.
Brown, S., & Vacca, F. (2022). Cultural sustainability in fashion: Reflections on craft and sustainable development models. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18, 590–600.
Cachon, G. P., & Swinney, R. (2011). The value of fast fashion: Quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. Management Science, 57, 778–795.
Carrico, M., & Kim, V. (2014). Expanding zero-waste design practices: A discussion paper. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 7, 58–64.
Casto, M. A., & DeLong, M. (2019). Exploring esthetic response to classic as a means to slow fashion. Fashion Practice, 11, 105–131.
Chao, H. (2019). A pilot study of upcycling methods for fabrics of sustainable fashion. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 677, 022134.
Chen, X., & Tabata, T. (2024). Circular economy in fashion: Consumer awareness and lifestyle, and environmental impact on second-hand clothes. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 26, 3876–3892.
Costa, J., & Broega, A. C. (2023). New sustainable materials for the fashion industry: The button in the circular economy. In Advances in design, music and arts II (Vol. 25, pp. 342–356). Springer.
Fletcher, K. (2010). Slow fashion: An invitation for systems change. Fashion Practice, 2, 259–265.
Freedman, E. A. (2020). Fashion after fashion. Fashion Theory, 24, 113–120.
Gedik, G., & Avinc, O. (2020). Hemp fiber as a sustainable raw material source for textile industry: Can we use its potential for more eco-friendly production? In S. S. Muthu & M. A. Gardetti (Eds.), Sustainability in the textile and apparel industries: Sourcing natural raw materials (pp. 87–109). Springer.
Guattari, F. (2000). The three ecologies. Continuum.
Gunasekar, V., & Ponnusami, V. (2015). Eco-friendly textile dyeing processes. In E. Lichtfouse, J. Schwarzbauer, & D. Robert (Eds.), Hydrogen production and remediation of carbon and pollutants (pp. 255–287). Springer.
Gwilt, A., & Rissanen, T. (2012). Shaping sustainable fashion: Changing the way we make and use clothes. Routledge.
Hall, P., & Hysing, E. (2019). Advancing voluntary chemical governance? The case of the Swedish textile industry dialogue. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 1001–1018.
Haq, U. N., & Ite, T. A. (2022). Exploratory study of textile undergraduates’ knowledge and perception towards eco-friendly clothing in Bangladesh. Tekstilec, 65, 44–57.
Henninger, C. E., Alevizou, P. J., Goworek, H., & Ryding, D. (2017). Sustainability in fashion: A cradle to upcycle approach. Springer.
Kamble, Z., & Behera, B. K. (2021). Upcycling textile wastes: Challenges and innovations. Textile Progress, 53, 65–122.
Kawamura, Y. (2005). Fashion-ology (1st ed.). Berg.
Kent, A., Winfield, S., & Shi, C. (2018). Commercialisation and the authenticity of vintage fashion. In D. Ryding, C. E. Henninger, & M. B. Cano (Eds.), Vintage luxury fashion: Exploring the rise of the secondhand clothing trade (pp. 205–218). Springer.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490.
Lee, Y. K. (2023). Exploring the value of sustainable fashion products among young Korean consumers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 16, 152–163.
Lei, G., & Li, X. (2021). A pattern making approach to improving zero-waste fashion design. Fashion Practice, 13, 443–463.
Ma, J. J. (2023). Development of education for sustainable fashion design using a challenge-based learning approach. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 16, 164–174.
Mandarić, D., Hunjet, A., & Vuković, D. (2022). The impact of fashion brand sustainability on consumer purchasing decisions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15, 176.
Maynard, M. (2013). Fast fashion and sustainability. Bloomsbury Academic.
Miller, J. I. (2005). Fashion and democratic relationships. Polity, 37, 3–23.
Minh, N. T., & Ngan, H. N. (2021). Vegan leather: An eco-friendly material for sustainable fashion towards environmental awareness. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2406, 060019.
Moon, K. K.-L., Lai, C. S.-Y., Lam, E. Y.-N., & Chang, J. M. (2015). Popularization of sustainable fashion: Barriers and solutions. Journal of the Textile Institute, 106, 939–952.
Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 189–200.
Niessen, S. (2020). Fashion, its sacrifice zone, and sustainability. Fashion Theory, 24, 859–877.
Nikolina, S. (2019). Environmental impact of the textile and clothing industry: What consumers need to know. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS).
Onur, D. A. (2020). Integrating circular economy, collaboration and craft practice in fashion design education in developing countries: A case from Turkey. Fashion Practice, 12, 55–77.
Orminski, J., Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Detenber, B. H. (2021). #sustainablefashion—A conceptual framework for sustainable fashion discourse on Twitter. Environmental Communication, 15, 115–132.
Palm, C. (2023). Sustainable fashion: To define, or not to define, that is not the question. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19, 2261342.
Paulicelli, E., Manlow, V., & Wissinger, E. (2021). The Routledge companion to fashion studies. Routledge.
Pesaran, D. M. V. (2018). People and placelessness: Paper clothing in Japan. Fashion Practice, 10, 236–255.
Pinchera, V., & Rinallo, D. (2021). Marketplace icon: The fashion show. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24, 479–491.
Pinchera, V., & Rinallo, D. (2021). Marketplace icon: The fashion show. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(6), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2020.1811631
Premkumar, S., Prakash, Y., Shirose, B., Dhivakar, K. M., Kapur, M., Puthiyavan, L. N., & Arul, S. (2022). T-Ceres—An automated machine for any T-shirt to bag conversion. In Lecture notes in mechanical engineering (pp. 247–257). Springer.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Rahman, O., & Gong, M. (2016). Sustainable practices and transformable fashion design—Chinese professional and consumer perspectives. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 9, 233–247.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
Sark, K., & Arnold, S. (2024). Fashion activism of Extinction Rebellion and Fashion Act Now. Fashion Theory, 28, 35–58.
Scaturro, S. (2008). Eco-tech fashion: Rationalizing technology in sustainable fashion. Fashion Theory, 12, 469–488.
Senanayake, R., & Hettiarachchige, V. G. (2020). A zero-waste garment construction approach using an indigenous textile weaving craft. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13, 101–109.
Strömberg, P. (2019). Industrial chic: Fashion shows in readymade spaces. Fashion Theory, 23, 25–56.
Strömberg, P. (2019). Industrial chic: Fashion shows in readymade spaces. Fashion Theory, 23(1), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2018.1493631
Sun, X., Wang, X., Sun, F., Tian, M., Qu, L., Perry, P., Owens, H., & Liu, X. (2021). Textile waste fiber regeneration via a green chemistry approach: A molecular strategy for sustainable fashion. Advanced Materials, 33, 2105174.
Särmäkari, N. (2023). Digital 3D fashion designers: Cases of Atacac and The Fabricant. Fashion Theory, 27, 85–114.
Thornquist, C. (2018). The fashion condition: Rethinking fashion from its everyday practices. Fashion Practice, 10, 289–310.
Voipio, V., Korpela, J., & Elfvengren, K. (2021). Environmental RFID: Measuring the relevance in the fashion industry. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 14, 284–292.
von Busch, O. (2022). ‘What is to be sustained?’: Perpetuating systemic injustices through sustainable fashion. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18, 400–409.
Williams, D. (2019). What’s going on? A discourse in fashion, design, and sustainability. Fashion Practice, 11, 283–290.
Wiktor-Mach, D. (2020). What role for culture in the age of sustainable development? UNESCO’s advocacy in the 2030 Agenda negotiations. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26, 312–327.
Widdows, H. (2018). Perfect me: Beauty as an ethical ideal. Princeton University Press.
Wood, J., Redfern, J., & Verran, J. (2023). Developing textile sustainability education in the curriculum: Pedagogical approaches to material innovation in fashion. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 16, 141–151.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.