A STUDY ON THE USAGE AREAS OF CHATGPT AND CHATGPT ADDICTION AMONG DIGITAL NATIVES

DİJİTAL YERLİLERDE CHATGPT’NİN KULLANIM ALANLARI VE CHATGPT BAĞIMLILIĞI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA


Abstract views: 24 / PDF downloads: 21

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17179422

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models, ChatGPT, Addiction, Problematic ChatGPT Use

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the purposes for which university students, representing digital natives, use ChatGPT, to assess their levels of ChatGPT addiction, and to identify whether there are significant differences between this addiction level and the participants' descriptive characteristics. The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 118 associate degree students enrolled in the Medical Documentation and Secretarial Program at a public university during the 2024–2025 academic year, all of whom had previously used ChatGPT for any purpose. In addition to descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, and confirmatory factor analysis were used for data analysis, conducted through IBM SPSS V.26 and IBM AMOS V.23 software. It was found that 27% of digital natives had been using ChatGPT for more than a year, only 3% preferred the paid version, and 74% were satisfied with the services provided by ChatGPT. Moreover, 70.4% of the participants reported using ChatGPT primarily for educational purposes, such as preparing assignments, studying, and exam preparation. The students were found to have a below-average level of ChatGPT addiction (21.5±7.9). Second-year students and those who reported satisfaction with ChatGPT services had significantly higher levels of ChatGPT addiction (p<0.05). In conclusion, although students' ChatGPT addiction levels were below average, some items indicated notable mental preoccupation. The absence of significant differences beyond class level and satisfaction with ChatGPT use suggests that addiction levels may be more closely related to usage purposes and behavioral factors.

       

References

Ahmadi, R., & Tekemen, H. (2024). Akdeniz Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin ChatGPT’nin Günlük Kullanımına İlişkin Eğilimleri. Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi, 5(3), 446-480. https://doi.org/10.52108/2757-5942.5.3.4

Alhaidry, H. M., Fatani, B., Alrayes, J. O., Almana, A. M., & Alfhaed, N. K. (2023). ChatGPT in dentistry: A comprehensive review. Cureus, 15(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38317

Ali, F., Tauni, M. Z., Ashfaq, M., Zhang, Q., & Ahsan, T. (2023).Depressive mood and compulsive social media usage: The mediatingroles of contingent self-esteem and social interaction fears.Information Technology & People, 37(3), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0057

Aljanabi, M., Ghazi, M., Ali, A. H., & Abed, S. A. (2023). ChatGpt: Open possibilities. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 4(1), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.0018

Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., & Amodu, O. A. (2024). An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, e1845. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1845

Chang, C.-T., Tu, C.-S., & Hajiyev, J. (2019). Integrating academic typeof social media activity with perceived academic performance: Arole of task-related and non-task-related compulsive Internet use.Computers & Education, 139, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.011

Chen, Y. H. (2025). Exploring the influence of generative artificial intelligence anxiety on problematic ChatGPT use: the fear of missing out and personality traits. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-025-01205-7

Ciudad-Fernández, V., von Hammerstein, C., & Billieux, J. (2025). People are not becoming “AIholic”: Questioning the “ChatGPT addiction” construct. Addictive Behaviors, 166, 108325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108325

Duong, C. D., Dao, T. T., Vu, T. N., Ngo, T. V. N., & Tran, Q. Y. (2024). Compulsive ChatGPT usage, anxiety, burnout, and sleep disturbance: A serial mediation model based on stimulus-organism-response perspective. Acta Psychologica, 251, 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104622

Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., Ngo, T. V. N., Do, N. D., & Tran, N. M. (2025). Reduced student life satisfaction and academic performance: Unraveling the dark side of ChatGPT in the higher education context. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(8), 4948-4963. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2356361

Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S., & Çinko, M. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde spss’le veri analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.

Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180

Gan, W., Ouyang, J., Li, H., Xue, Z., Zhang, Y., Dong, Q., ... & Zhang, Y. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT in orthopedic education for medical undergraduates: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 26, e57037. https://doi.org/10.2196/57037

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Jiang, P. H., & Hong, J. C. (2025). ChatGPT Addiction, Self-Efficacy, and Continuous Intention: Differences in Gender, Academic Majors, and Purposes of Use. Metaverse and Artificial Companions in Education and Society, 8.

Lin, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., & Jiang, P. H. (2025). ChatGPT addiction predicted by openness to using new technology and self-efficacy, and reflected in continuous intention. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2471910

Maral, S., Naycı, N., Bilmez, H., Erdemir, E. İ., & Satici, S. A. (2025). Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale: AI-Human Collaboration or Unraveling the Dark Side of ChatGPT. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-025-01509-y

Meydan, H. & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

Phang, J., Lampe, M., Ahmad, L., Agarwal, S., Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., ... & Maes, P. (2025). Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.03888.

Seçer, M. B. (2024). Sağlık alanında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin sağlıkta yapay zekâ uygulamaları ve ChatGPT farkındalığı, yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik görüşleri ve teknostres düzeylerinin incelenmesi: kesitsel bir çalışma. Turkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(4), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2024-104224

Shewale, R. (2023). 32 Detailed ChatGPT Statistics — Users, Revenue and Trends. Demandsage. https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/

Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş, Temel İlkeler ve LİSREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.

Veras, M., Dyer, J. O., Rooney, M., Silva, P. G. B., Rutherford, D., & Kairy, D. (2023). Usability and efficacy of artificial intelligence chatbots (ChatGPT) for health sciences students: protocol for a crossover randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 12(1), e51873. https://doi.org/10.2196/51873

Wang, W., Chen, R. R., & Yang, X. (2023). Examining compulsive useof social media: The dual effects of individual needs and peer4962 C. D. DUONG ET AL.influence. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(12), 3109–3136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2022-0631

Yankouskaya, A., Liebherr, M., & Ali, R. (2025). Can ChatGPT be addictive? A call to examine the shift from support to dependence in AI conversational large language models. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-025-00090-w

Yu, S. C., Chen, H. R., & Yang, Y. W. (2024). Development and validation the Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale: a preliminary report. Current Psychology, 43(31), 26080-26092. Shewale, R. (2023). 32 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06259-z

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

HOŞGÖR, H. K., & GÜNGÖRDÜ, H. (2025). A STUDY ON THE USAGE AREAS OF CHATGPT AND CHATGPT ADDICTION AMONG DIGITAL NATIVES: DİJİTAL YERLİLERDE CHATGPT’NİN KULLANIM ALANLARI VE CHATGPT BAĞIMLILIĞI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 11(57), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17179422